Construction Shift Question Answers
and Explanations
Below you will find the answers and some explanations to the Construction
Shift questions to help you understand
why the answers are the correct ones. After each explanation, you will
find links to websites that will help you practice the skill
that each answer is challenging you to understand.(Please note that the sources
used for Skill Practices I and II are Evelyn Farbman's A Writer's Guide:
Sentence Sense website, Houghton Mifflin's E-library Student Resource Center site,
Plain English Network, Augsburg College On-Line Writing Lab,
HyperGrammar from the Writing Centre at the University of Ottawa, and
Purdue University's Online Writing Lab)
1.
The answer here is c.
Many students, having heard so many times that using the word "because"
in a sentence is "bad" or wrong might be fooled with this one. Bottom line is that the choice
with the word "because" is the best one because (there's that word again)
it is the proper connecting word and results in much smoother and simpler
sentence construction. Words like "because," "on account of,"
"by," and "being as" create dependent clauses. "Because" also
works best for this example since it is more concise (note that with one word
you get the same meaning as the others) and has the best "cause and effect"
results. Below find some practice with the use of dependent clauses.
Skill Practice I
Skill Practice II
2.
The answer here is c.
Flipping the sentence around so that "Melody and lyrics" are in the
front forces you into a situation of using a possessive. Since the "her songs"
can go, the possessive here makes it easier to keep the same meaning. The other
possible answer is b, but the meaning would be altered too much from the
original. The most concise way then to create a new version would be
Melody and lyrics in Ani Defranco's songs intricately intertwine.
Notice "her" and "makes" are removed in this simpler construction. Below find some
possessive practice activities.
Skill Practice I
Skill Practice II
3.
The answer here is c.
What's going on here is that "Unlike liquids" in the beginning
forces you to put the words "solid objects" next. Why? Well, "Unlike
liquids" describes nothing but "solid objects" which is the subject of
the sentence. Introductory verbal phrases, which is what "Unlike
liquids" is in this case, must modify the subject of the sentence. Therefore,
the choice is down to two: c or d. The original sentence uses "cannot."
As a result, the choice with the word "can" keeps to a closer meaning
of the original.
Skill Practice I
Skill Practice II
4.
Correct! The answer here is b.
This is a tough one because the subject is so long. If you keep
it simple in your mind, you'll realize that the subject is, when all is
said and done, still "children." And the only word that's a natural
fit after "children" in this sentence would be "told." Use "children"
with the other choices and there's a good chance you'll hear the awkwardness.
The phrase that follows children and complicates things forms a
nonessential modifying clause.
Below find some practice with that grammatical form.
Skill Practice I
Skill Practice II
5.
Correct! The answer here is b.
This one is about style and preserving the meaning of the original
sentence with the most exactness. The original "if" statement presents
a "cause and effect" situation. "Because" is the best word to use in
the rewrite since it keeps that cause and effect relationship alive. Below
see some pointers on dependent clauses, which often create "cause and
effect" situations in writing.
Skill Practice I
Skill Practice II
6.
Correct! The answer here is a.
This one, as with number 5, is also about style and preserving the meaning of the original
sentence with the most exactness, but this involves
more thinking about the "cause and effect" relationship involving time.
In the original, one event happens (the band playing) and then another
(the real party starting) None of the other choices, "and . . .,"
"although . . .," "the band beginning . . ." preserve that time
feature in the original. Again, the skill involves dependent clauses
and their relationships with independent ones. See the skill practice
links to number 5 to review these skills.
7.
Correct! The answer here is d.
This kind of situation actually can create some amusing images. The rule
is that an introductory phrase must modify the subject of a sentence. That
being the case, the following word after "Listening in the park . . ." has
to be someone that can listen; the words "no," "then," and "and," which
begin answers a, b, and c can't listen--they have no ears. We can be certain
that Alisa has ears though. See below for practice with introductory
phrases.
Skill Practice I
Skill Practice II
8.
Correct! The answer here is b.
This presents the same situation as in number 7: the word "they"
is needed after the introductory clause because the introductory clause
refers to the hikers. But the added challenge here is that you need to
know or sense that introductory dependent clauses need a comma to set
them off from the main clause. See below for some practice with using
commas.
Skill Practice I
Skill Practice II
9.
Correct! The answer here is b.
Sometimes sentences have ideas that are unequal. If one idea
explains another, it is put in what's called a subordinate position or
a "lesser" position. The "lesser" idea should be expressed in a
subordinate clause. It is better style to place the subordinate clause
at the beginning and when doing so a comma is needed as in questions number
8 above. See below for practice with subordinate clauses.
Skill Practice I
Skill Practice II
10.
Correct! The answer here is c.
The rewrite forces you to avoid using ambiguous or confusing
references to "you." Also, it makes you think about the clearest way
to say something. In this example, you need to grasp the logic that
people don't have traffic jams; cars do. Doing so, helps you with the most
coherent arrangement in the sentence. Below find practice with clarity
and coherence in writing.
Skill Practice I
Skill Practice II